<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lasse Storgaard &#187; Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/tag/exchange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lassestorgaard.dk</link>
	<description>En blog om teknologi, politik og alt imellem himmel og jord!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:28:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mine exchange problemer &#8211; ikke understøttede EAS policies som mit arbejde kræver</title>
		<link>http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2012/02/mine-exchange-problemer-ikke-understottede-eas-policies-som-mit-arbejde-kraever/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mine-exchange-problemer-ikke-understottede-eas-policies-som-mit-arbejde-kraever</link>
		<comments>http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2012/02/mine-exchange-problemer-ikke-understottede-eas-policies-som-mit-arbejde-kraever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lasse Storgaard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teknologi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WP7.5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/?p=881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Der er en Paul Thurrot som har været så flink, at blogge om mine problemer med Exchange og WP7: http://windowsphonesecrets.com/2010/12/10/windows-phone-7-and-exchange-active-sync/ Ja det ser vidst ud til, at det er manglende understøttelse af hardware kryptering der skaber problemet, men det er et skud fra hoften. Microsoft har også en Technet artikel som, Paul også linker til: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/exchange-activesync-considerations-when-using-windows-phone-7-clients.aspx Håber [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content" style="float:left;"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-left"><script type="text/javascript">
			<!-- 
				tweetmeme_url = "http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2012/02/mine-exchange-problemer-ikke-understottede-eas-policies-som-mit-arbejde-kraever/";
				tweetmeme_source = "socializeWP";
				tweetmeme_style = "normal";
				
			//-->
			</script>
                        <script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-left"><script>
			<!-- 
			var fbShare = {
				url: "http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2012/02/mine-exchange-problemer-ikke-understottede-eas-policies-som-mit-arbejde-kraever/",
				size: "large",
				google_analytics: "true"
			}
			//-->
			</script>
                        <script src="http://widgets.fbshare.me/files/fbshare.js"></script></div></div><p>Der er en Paul Thurrot som har været så flink, at blogge om mine problemer med Exchange og WP7: <a href="http://windowsphonesecrets.com/2010/12/10/windows-phone-7-and-exchange-active-sync/">http://windowsphonesecrets.com/2010/12/10/windows-phone-7-and-exchange-active-sync/</a></p>
<p>Ja det ser vidst ud til, at det er manglende understøttelse af hardware kryptering der skaber problemet, men det er et skud fra hoften.</p>
<p>Microsoft har også en Technet artikel som, Paul også linker til: <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/exchange-activesync-considerations-when-using-windows-phone-7-clients.aspx">http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/exchange-activesync-considerations-when-using-windows-phone-7-clients.aspx</a></p>
<p>Håber snart de skubber en opdatering på dette ud.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2012/02/mine-exchange-problemer-ikke-understottede-eas-policies-som-mit-arbejde-kraever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A different perspective on Google Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2010/02/a-different-perspective-on-google-buzz/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-different-perspective-on-google-buzz</link>
		<comments>http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2010/02/a-different-perspective-on-google-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lasse Storgaard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teknologi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of people have taken on an opinion on Google Buzz &#8211; so have I, but for most part, I don&#8217;t agree with anybody. Reports are running in, as you might have guessed, that Buzz is lame and no match to Twitter or Facebook. An argument that seems reasonable, but from my point of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content" style="float:left;"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-left"><script type="text/javascript">
			<!-- 
				tweetmeme_url = "http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2010/02/a-different-perspective-on-google-buzz/";
				tweetmeme_source = "socializeWP";
				tweetmeme_style = "normal";
				
			//-->
			</script>
                        <script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-left"><script>
			<!-- 
			var fbShare = {
				url: "http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2010/02/a-different-perspective-on-google-buzz/",
				size: "large",
				google_analytics: "true"
			}
			//-->
			</script>
                        <script src="http://widgets.fbshare.me/files/fbshare.js"></script></div></div><p><img class="  alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" title="Google Buzz" src="http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/1444417344-GoogleBuzzLogo68.png" alt="Google Buzz" width="286" height="68" /></p>
<p>A lot of people have taken on an opinion on Google Buzz &#8211; so have I, but for most part, I don&#8217;t agree with anybody. Reports are running in, as you might have guessed, that Buzz is lame and no match to Twitter or Facebook. An argument that seems reasonable, but from my point of view it is not true. See the twitter <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=google%20buzz" target="_blank">opinion</a> and Business Insider with a <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/what-twitter-is-saying-about-google-buzz-2010-2" target="_blank">pre-review</a>.</p>
<p>A couple of days ago, I had a class in Strategy and Performance Measurement. One of my classmates argued that Google lacked direction and didn&#8217;t have a uniform business strategy. If your point of view are the Mainstream Perception (MP) of Google, yes then it might seem like Google lacks a direction in strategy. The MP is something like &#8220;Hey look what we made&#8221; attitude towards new products and technology. What you should realize is that every new feature or function, such as Google Buzz, are an improvement on the Business Platform Google are building. The platform is known as <a href="http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en-GB/business/index.html" target="_blank">Google Apps</a>, as you might know already.</p>
<p>If you have tried Google Buzz, and didn&#8217;t like it &#8211; Then you should consider the business case:</p>
<p>Your company are using Google Apps. This means it is the primary fascilitator of communications. You are running an intranet on Google Sites, you are video chatting and instant messaging (IM) through Talk, sharing calenders, sharing documents and using their Office Application and E-mail client. Your e-mail are Pushed to your smartphone along with contacts and calendar updates and so forth. In between the E-mail and IM communication there is a gap. The E-mail are able to reach every one in your company but in a very formel and &#8220;slow&#8221; mannor. IM are fast, easy to use and not so formal but limited to a very small subset of the company. Buzz  are just as Facebook and Twitter, an agile communicator with the ability to reach a crowd and still a be a Point to Point (P2P) communicator. The difference is, it is an integrated service. Which I think i very powerful!</p>
<p>Google Buzz might not be a revolution to personal users. But it is yet another screwdriver (not the drink) in the toolbox towards making Google Apps a VERY serious competitor to Microsofts company IT architecture.</p>
<h3>Why do Google have this strategy?</h3>
<p>Well because they are pretty good at predicting the future. Since more and more communications have moved from offline communication, to inhouse hosted services and later on to cloud services. Google are pointing in the direction that the future of company communication services are Cloud based and preferrely based on their services, rather than an expensive infrastructure from Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lassestorgaard.dk/2010/02/a-different-perspective-on-google-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

